Book Reviews

Book Review: Piker’s Retribution

by Amanda N. Newman

Recommend (for those who liked book 1)
Where to find:

Amazon

Barnes & Nobles

*Spoiler Alert: Please be aware that this is the second book in this series. If you haven’t read the previous novel, this review might spoil events in that book. If you want to see my review of the first novel, click here.

Tyra is a Piker. That makes her a supporter of the Dingoes. Her adoptive father was also a Piker before he was killed by a Republic Solider. Even eight years later, she can’t get over the pain of his loss. She refuses to accept anything related to the Republic no matter what. But, one day her leader decides to buy some slaves, and slaves are captured from the Republic…

Piker’s Retribution is an interesting sequel for Amanda Newman’s first novel Children of the Outback. Instead of continuing forward with the characters that we came to know in the first book, she has taken us to another group. We get to see more about the Piker group who helped the Dingos during the conflict with the Republic at the end of the first book. In fact, other than the details concerning the setting and magic system, any reader who picked up this book would be able to follow the plot line with only minimal difficulties. I actually really like that about this book. It is a refreshing change to have a series that expands outwards instead of moving forward down a liner path. Newman did a good job eventually connecting it back to the events of the first novel in an unexpected way. 

I also really like how she continues to expand the world building from what we experienced before. Our understanding of the types of people, creatures, and magic that exist in this version of Australia, grows and develops as she adds new elements and characters. While reading the previous novel, I liked the unique world Newman created, and now, I think it is her strongest draw for this series. It could easily incise a reader to want to read more with a third novel.

Unfortunately, there were several aspects of the novel that didn’t work so well for me. The most prevalent aspect was how unrealistic the slave characters were. I understand the personalities that Newman was trying to give both them (Tejal and Holly); however, ninety percent of their actions didn’t make any sense to me. There are countless times that one or both of them say something to their owners, or in front of their owners, that wouldn’t really happen. Both of them ask very forward questions of their owners after thinking about how they are too scared to ask questions. Or, they discuss how terrible their owners have to be right in front of said owner. I find that to be completely unrealistic even though their Piker masters are nice guys. There is just no way that scared slave girls would do that. It became very frustrating for me to continue to read these interactions.

Once I was getting close to the end of the novel, I started to think that the interactions between Holly, Tejal and their owners really highlighted how Newman’s storytelling is still needing to develop and improve. It felt, to me, like she was using these dialogues between owner and slave, or slave and slave, in order to tell the reader something, and didn’t know how else to present it. This includes things like a development of the character, world building, or an explanation of an event. I noticed this happened some in Children of the Outback, but this novel really felt like it could use a bit more sophistication to the storytelling and the interactions between characters.

Lastly, I would like to touch on Tyra, who is one of our main characters for this novel. I really admire what Newman was going for with this character, but Tyra didn’t make much sense to me. Her entire motivation throughout this entire novel revolves around her hate for all things Republic. In the start, I understood this motivation considering it came from the death of her father, which is established right away. However, I felt like Newman made Tyra’s hate too strong for her morals. By that, I mean that Tyra’s hate is all consuming to the point that she barely tolerates interacting with people who are in contact with slaves or people who might be from the Republic. However, she doesn’t feel like slavery is a good thing. She doesn’t want to hurt or kill anyone from the Republic, and she doesn’t want to be near any slaves. For how strong Tyra’s hate is, I would think that she would want revenge on anyone or anything Republic, including owning slaves or enjoying treating them poorly. I understand that Newman is trying to show that despite her hate, Tyra is a good person, but I felt like the motivations and the actions didn’t really work well in this story. There were several times were I was questioning her actions and motivations.

Overall, I was a little disappointed by this book. I enjoyed the first one, but this sequel had too many inconsistencies for me to enjoy it as much as I was hoping. I would recommend giving it a shot to anyone who really enjoyed the first book. It is entirely possible that the things that bothered me might not bother you, but I wouldn’t recommend it otherwise. If you think this book might be of interest, I suggest starting with the first one and see if you like it enough to want to continue.

Pros:

  • Unique Storyline
  • New elements not seen in the first book
  • Connected to events in book one
  • Continued world building

Cons:

  • Unrealistic character interactions
  • Confusing character motivations
  • Weaker storytelling

Recommended for Readers Who Like:

  • Book one of the series
  • First person point of view
  • Darker themed stories

Book Details:

  • Published: May 24, 2021
  • Series: Tales From the Outback
  • Book Number: 2
  • Pages: 543
  • Publisher: Self-published

If you want to see my rating system Click Here

Amanda N Newman’s website: Click Here

If you want to see other books by Newman, I have a review of her young adult novel Hybrid Empire. Click here to read it.